Could Stablecoins Be The Answer to Cryptocurrency Woes? 4 954

You might be curious about investing in crypto. You maybe even made a few bucks (or lost some, depending on your timing). But the infamous volatility in cryptocurrency value makes it almost unviable as an actual method of paying for goods and services. After all, you may dabble in digital money in an exchange, but would you be willing to accept your wages in Bitcoin? That’s where stablecoins are a game changer.

When FUD washes through the sensitive markets, digital coins like Bitcoin and Ethereum are highly unreliable. You could make a significant increase one day, but you could also take home half pay the next. Maybe that’s not a problem when it comes to purchasing a coffee or a FMCG, but when you’re buying high ticket items or receiving a regular salary, volatile cryptos are not the answer.

Enter Stablecoins

In an attempt to establish a commonly agreed upon worth, stablecoins are growing in popularity. Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies that are pegged to another stable asset. This includes the US dollar, gold, and even silver. That makes for low volatility, without tying it to any central bank and allows for more practical, everyday usage.

Stablecoins are causing a lot of excitement in the crypto world as they could be the catalyst for widespread adoption of digital money. The fact that they are still decentralized means that transaction fees are low or non-existent, and they offer a certain degree of privacy as well. But obviously the main advantage to stablecoins, as the name suggests, is their stability.

Stablecoins provide a viable altcoin that can be used in everyday transactions and for long term payment schemes as well.

So, the question now may be not whether stablecoins will take off, but who will be the first to do it successfully? There are already a few on the market, but they each have their advantages and drawbacks.

Tether

Tether is pegged to the US dollar and claims to be 100 percent backed by fiat currency. For every digital tether coin, there is a tangible dollar behind it. 1 tether USTD equals $1 USD. Simple. But not without its issues.

While its stable value is widely recognized, tether could be a ticking bomb, as its trading volume regularly exceeds its market cap. And more than one authority is beginning to question its claims. Its centralization goes against the cryptocurrency philosophy, as well.

MakerDao

Unlike Tether, Maker is decentralized. Like Tether, it is also pegged to the US dollar, but it’s backed by ETH as well. Their stable coins are called Dai and each one is worth $1 USD. The price stability is achieved through an autonomous system of smart contracts.

Being backed by ETH means that Dai is on the blockchain and therefore transparent. But the process of purchasing Dai is a little complex. Its entire system is hard to get to grips with and probably not user friendly enough to become mainstream.

NuBits

Don’t let the name put you off. NuBits has been successfully trading for a few years already, as one of the first stablecoins to emerge. When it first came out, cryptocurrency was not as volatile, and many people questioned the point of a digital currency that could not be used for investment purposes. But NuBits has proven its worth. The only market their USNBT coin lost value to was Bitcoin, which is hardly surprising considering the latter’s meteoric rise.

NuBits offers a good option for those looking for almost zero volatility. It’s also cheap to spend, as there are no vendor fees, which means it’s more attractive than using a credit card. And there are also no chargebacks for vendors, as all transactions are irreversible.

If cryptocurrencies will ever go mainstream or even replace fiat currency completely, they will need to be price stable. While Bitcoin and Ether continue to rise and fall, stablecoins could be on the up and up.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Christina is a technology and business communicator who has worked with high profile ICOs and blockchain influencers to break industry news.

4 Comments

  1. Nice blog here! Also your web site loads up very fast! What host are you using?
    Can I get your affiliate link to your host?
    I wish my web site loaded up as fast as yours lol

  2. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting
    my own blog and was curious what all is required to get setup?
    I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny?
    I’m not very web smart so I’m not 100% certain.
    Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated.
    Many thanks

  3. After going over a few of the blog posts on your site, I seriously like your
    technique of writing a blog. I saved it to my bookmark webpage list and will be checking back soon. Please
    check out my web site as well and tell me what you think.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bitcoin Uses As Much Energy As Austria, Could Add 2°C to Earth’s Atmosphere 2,187 14281

Bitcoin mining, it turns out, damages the earth more than more traditional environmental assaults like actual mineral mining.

According to a paper published Monday in Nature Sustainability, the power-hungry Bitcoin mining process consumes more than triple the amount of energy needed to mine the equivalent amount of gold, more than quadruple what’s needed for copper, and more than double what it takes to mine platinum.

Other coins didn’t fare much better. By their measurements, Ethereum and Litecoin consume 7 megajoules of electricity to produce the equivalent of $1, the same energy expenditure as copper mining but more than that of platinum or gold. Monero eats up 14 megajoules to produce $1.

Naturally, these measurements refer to the notoriously variable dollar valuations of such tokens. “While the market prices of the coins are quite volatile,” write researchers Max J. Krause and Thabet Tolaymat, “the network hashrates for three of the four cryptocurrencies have trended consistently upward, suggesting that energy requirements will continue to increase.”

Bitcoin’s Growing Electricity Bill is Bigger Than Some Countries

We’ve long known that Bitcoin is unsustainable. In a 2015 article for Motherboard, Christopher Malmo pointed out that a single Bitcoin transaction used 5,033 times as much energy as a Visa swipe, and could power 1.5 American homes for a day.

The electricity used to crunch Bitcoin code—and its environmental cost—has been growing with its increasing popularity. Digiconomist’s Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index shows Bitcoin currently consuming 73.12 terawatt hours (or 263.232 billion megajoules) of electricity annually. To put that in context, it’s comparable to the amount of energy it takes to power Austria for a year.

That means there are 175ish countries on earth using less energy than Bitcoin (to say nothing of crypto on the whole), while 66 countries consume less energy per capita than one Bitcoin transaction (it takes 94 thousand kilowatt hours of electricity to mine a single Bitcoin).

Iceland, a major hub of Bitcoin mining farms, spends nearly as much energy on Bitcoin as it does powering its residential homes. In this case, the damage is mitigated because most of Iceland’s power comes from renewable energy.

Canada’s Bitcoin emissions are also on the lower end due to renewable energy sources. They’re using this to court mining companies from China, where mining emissions are about four times that of Canada’s. Montreal International attracts foreign investment by calling Quebec the land of “green bitcoin”. This has caught the eye of some Chinese mining companies looking to go overseas as the Chinese government has discouraged expansion and shut down some mining operations altogether.

Depending on Bitcoin’s growth, some have projected that it could use as much energy as the entire world by 2020.

Digital Currency Has a Real Carbon Footprint

Krause’s and Tolaymat’s research reminds us of the sobering reality that all this invisible wealth has real world costs.

For the 30 months they measured between January 2016 and June 2018, they estimate their four featured tokens collectively belched out at least 3 million tons of CO2 emissions, possibly as much as 15 million tons.

These findings follow another study, published last month, which determined Bitcoin alone could add two degrees Celcius to global warming within the next three decades. That’s enough to raise ocean acidity by 29 percent.

Solving Bitcoin’s Energy Consumption Crisis

So what is the solution? If the world were to switch to 100 percent renewable energy overnight, the problem would be moot. But we can’t hold our breath for that. There could be ways of incentivizing clean energy so greener mines reap more coins, or of implementing clean energy in other ways.

It’s also possible to adopt less computationally intensive mining algorithms so the mining computers don’t guzzle as much juice. This would disappoint a lot of old school Bitcoiners who have invested in hardware, but their feelings don’t really outweigh that 2 degrees celcius that everyone will have to live with (or die by).

Whatever the best solution turns out to be, something needs to change soon. Bitcoin is growing up, and it’s time for it to mature into something more sustainable.

Kenya Looks to Blockchain for Affordable Housing Project 9 11440

The “Silicon Savannah” is moving deeper in direction of tech. The Kenyan government has announced a plan to manage the property allocation and funding of 500,000 affordable housing units with blockchain technology.

The units, which the government aims to build by 2022, will be set aside for households with an annual income below 100,000 Kenyan Shillings, about $990 USD. The World Bank estimates Kenya’s gross national income per capita at $1,290, according to Business Daily.

Blockchain will help ensure that the affordable housing is in fact going to those who fall below the average income bracket. Land title fraud has caused problems for Kenyans, as land grabbers target homes and even schools for illegal sales and development. Blockchain’s ability to store verifiable proof of title could help safeguard against fraudsters.

“Kenya will use blockchain technology to ensure the rightful owners live in government funded housing projects,” said Principal Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Charles Hinga, speaking with the World Bank on Monday.

Hinga said the plan will be financed by the National Housing Fund, which will raise over $59.5 million per month to get the project underway. But Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Infrastructure, Housing and Urban Development James Macharia said it will take $31.7 billion to build a million homes, each of which will cost between $3,000 and $30,000. Macharia called for support from private sector financing.

Under the financing plan, working Kenyans will contribute 1.5 percent of their salary, which will be matched by their employers. “On affordable housing one should not spend more than 30% of their disposable income for housing,” Hinga tweeted yesterday. “Anything above 30% is not affordable.”

A Trustless Relationship Between People and Government

The initiative represents a considerable push to solve housing and title problems for the nation’s lower income families. But how will the government decide to whom the housing units will go? With so much talk about financing underway, people are already calling on the government to outline a plan for how they’ll distribute the affordable housing units.

The government will need to deliver the housing projects in a time when, Hinga acknowledges, the public is skeptical. Earlier this year $78 million went missing in a corruption scandal involving the National Youth Services. Where there is little trust between the people and their government, Kenya hopes to establish transparency through the blockchain’s distributed ledger system.

Kenya’s Move Toward Tech

In March, Kenya’s Ministry of Information, Communications and Technology appointed a blockchain taskforce to explore the ways the nation could use blockchain technology in the public and private sectors. They called it the Distributed Ledgers and Artificial Intelligence taskforce, and by September its chairman, Bitange Ndemo, was calling on the government to tokenize the economy.

Ndemo also proposed government implementation of blockchain to certify the authenticity of retail goods, so consumers can be sure of where their food is coming from, for example.

Governor of Kenya’s central bank Patrick Njoroge has also voiced support for the use of blockchain technology to strengthen service delivery, although he’s opposed the use of tokens and digital currencies.

But the affordable housing initiative could be the Kenyan government’s first real world implementation of the blockchain.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks