Twitter Gets Tough on @Bitcoin (Again) 0 2313

@Bitcoin Ban

Social media platforms and search engines don’t seem to like digital currency very much. After Google announced the ad ban on any content related to cryptocurrency, ICOs, or exchanges, Twitter promptly followed suit. And its stance against cryptocurrency is turning positively aggressive, as now even the @Bitcoin account has been banned, as well.

While the reasons for banning advertisements may be in the best interests of Twitter users, it’s not clear as to the purpose behind the outright ban on the @Bitcoin handle.

What’s Behind The @Bitcoin Account Ban?

Speculation, speculation, speculation. Is Twitter in league with some mysterious entity driven on flooding the crypto markets with FUD? Is there something underhand happening that the wider public don’t know about? Twitter claims that the @Bitcoin Twitter account, is in “violation of the Twitter rules.” Which could be 101 different things, and this vague statement raises a lot of additional questions.

For an account to get suspended on this social media platform, it has to get a few complaints. And it needs to be reported by several people. Well, the @Bitcoin account has certainly had its fair share of adversaries over the last few months.

A lot of the people against the @Bitcoin handle seem to be Bitcoin fans themselves. The content shared lately by this account seemed to be favoring Bitcoin Cash over the classic Bitcoin. (For those of you who don’t know, there are many purists within the crypto space. They don’t like false claims or misinformation being spread).

Is This a Slippery Slope to Censorship?

Bitcoin is still not illegal in most countries, albeit, traded without the backing of any government so far. However, many countries, especially Japan and South Korea seem to be embracing the digital currency and cryptocurrencies in general, while others like Bolivia and China have banned it.

Twitter making such a drastic move starts to look a little like censorship, especially when Google will no longer display crypto advertisements either.

And while it’s very nice of Twitter to look out for its users’ best interests, its users are, for the most part, adults who can decide for themselves where to invest their money. It remains to be proven that the @Bitcoin account was actually spreading misinformation, as no evidence of this has been submitted, thus far. In fact, it may not have even violated Twitter’s terms of service, so it could be reinstated.

Twitter and Cryptocurrency in General

What has a lot of people wondering is just how aggressive Twitter plans to get on cryptocurrency in general. Because with the way they’re treating @Bitcoin, it is starting to feel an awful lot like using a search engine or social media platform in China or Russia. Preventing advertisements thought to be misleading is one thing. Preventing open discussion about a topic that is not even illegal on social media is another.

And will it lead to regular accounts being shut down should they dare to speculate on the state of digital money? Thanks to the reaction from the crypto community and public at large over this maneuver, it’s likely that Twitter will release some kind of statement at the very least. This is not the first time the @Bitcoin account was suspended from Twitter. And the last time, the account was reinstated pretty fast. Whether that will be the case this time around is not clear.

But as is the case in this lawless community, new developments happen daily to drive the discord and fractionism among parties. We’ve already seen a breakaway from those who prefer Bitcoin Cash over traditional Bitcoin. We’ve seen a split between Ethereum and Ethereum Classic. And now we’ll certainly hear of other debates as emotions escalate and contribute to the already bearish crypto markets.

Previous ArticleNext Article
Christina is a technology and business communicator who has worked with high profile ICOs and blockchain influencers to break industry news.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Block Talk Award Winners Announced 1 1039

Thanks to everyone for submitting your favorite blockchain innovators and influencers. Our editorial team had a great time learning about new projects and individuals that are building a foundation for our future with blockchain technology, and realizing amazing technological feats in the present.

While it was difficult to select just one project or individual in each category, we’re excited to announce the winners of our first inaugural Block Talk Awards.

  • Best ICO Analysis & Commentary – Tatiana Koffman, Various Outlets
  • Most Engaged Community – Rod Turner, Various Outlets
  • Favorite Blockchain Blogger – Rachel Wolfson, Forbes
  • Best Crypto Journalist – Jordan French, The Street
  • Innovative Female Founder – Amber Baldet, Clovyr
  • Best Podcast Host(s) – Joel Comm and Travis Wright, Bad Crypto
  • Favorite Blockchain Event Host – Adryenn Ashley, Loly.io
  • Top Crypto Speaker – Ian Balina, Crypto World Tour
  • Most Innovative Blockchain CEO – Trevor Koverko, Polymath
  • Top Social Entrepreneur – Evan Caron, Swytch

Winners in each category will receive a $1500 media credit on The Block Talk, access to a network of TBT Award honorees, and VIP access to TBT events in 2019.

Defrauding Crypto CEO Josh Garza  Sentenced in Landmark Case 0 55

The disgraced former CEO of fraudulent crypto company GAW Miners has reached the end of a legal saga spanning more than three years. Josh Garza has been sentenced to 21 months in prison and payments of $9,182,000 in damages. His prison term will be followed by three years of supervised release, including six months of home confinement.

US Attorney for the District of Connecticut John H. Durham announced the sentence, which follows Garza’s guilty plea to wire fraud.

How GAW Miners Lost Their Zen

GAW Miners started as a cloud mining service. Fraud allegations began to emerge in 2014, and formal charges followed. The SEC accused GAW with acting as a Ponzi scheme by selling more crypto mining power than they really had. Around that time, GAW also peddled its token, PayCoin, which they promised had a $20 ‘floor.’ That floor dropped out in 2015, to the ire of beswindled token holders. By the end of January, one PayCoin was worth less than $2.

According to the Department of Justice, Garza “stated that the market value of a single paycoin would not fall below $20 per unit because Garza’s companies had a reserve of $100 million that the companies would use to purchase paycoins to drive up its price. In fact, no such reserve existed.”

Nor did an $8 million transaction in which GAW’s parent company allegedly purchased controlling shares of ZenMiner (another company founded and operated by Garza). “Garza made multiple false statements related to the scheme,” the release states, “to generate business and attract customers and investors.”

The PayCoin collapse initiated the undoing of GAW and ultimately of Garza. GAW tried to bounce back with some unsuccessful endeavors like a crypto exchange called Mineral and a platform for making Amazon purchases called CoinStand, before the company went into default for failing to pay their power bill.

The truth eventually began to come to light after internal emails and documents surfaced, after GAW went under separate investigations by the SEC and the DOJ. A few years later, these investigations have finally resulted in Thursday’s sentence.

Justice and Fraud in CryptoSpace

The sentence is a win for the Department of Justice, which has been puzzling over how to govern the crypto world, and could set precedents for following cases, including investigations already underway.

A Bloomberg study has found that over 80 percent of ICOs are scams. Meanwhile, TechCrunch reports that over 1,000 crypto projects have failed in 2018, and $1.1 billion in cryptocurrencies have been stolen this year, according to CNBC.

The crypto landscape and the justice system clearly have some reckoning to do, but investors need to exercise serious caution in the meantime. Although Garza’s sentence sets a precedent, it’s based on a situation that’s not necessarily unique.

Garza’s Sentence May Not Satisfy Defrauded Victims

Critics of the sentence have pointed out how with good behavior Garza could be out in 18 months, a light load considering his fraudulent acquisitions through PayCoin could’ve totaled $20 million by some estimates, and considering the 20 years of prison time per infraction Garza was facing in court. The lighter sentence was part of a plea deal.

While Garza denied all charges at first, he expressed remorse about his actions in a courtroom statement Thursday, according to CoinDesk. Garza is ordered to report to prison on January 4th, 2019.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks