Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Are Bringing Transparency and Verifiability to Loyalty Programs 2 4847

New blockchain apps using cryptocurrency as rewards and cash back have the potential to improve the loyalty space. Read on to learn how.

Blockchain, Cryptocurrency, and Loyalty Programs

The International Council of Shopping Centers reports that the loyalty space grows by about 30% every year, with 85% of consumers belonging to at least one loyalty program, circulating $300 billion between them annually. With so many users and so much money circulating through loyalty programs, adding blockchain-related features and cryptocurrency mechanics would help companies offload complexity and interact with crucial partners and customers, taking stress off of core loyalty programs.

Blockchain technology would also allow companies with large balance sheet liabilities stemming from redemption bottlenecks to open up redemption options, widening these bottlenecks to increase revenues. Lastly, incorporating blockchain tech into loyalty programs would allow partners to integrate loyalty programs seamlessly regardless of their size, helping them craft trendy offers more easily and eliminate back-end redemption problems.

The largest problem loyalty programs face today is a dual one: they are being used at an all-time high rate, while the total number of unredeemed points (and the cost of managing them) is growing. The average US household today participates in an average of 29 different loyalty programs, according to the 2015 Colloquy Loyalty Census. New accounting standards, however, state that revenue attributed to loyalty points must be deferred until the redemption conditions are met.

With so many overlapping and often confusing rules and regulations for redeeming points, rewards, and cash back in so many places, companies operating loyalty programs are losing money from consumers’ analysis paralysis. People aren’t redeeming to their full potential due to the large and confusing web of guidelines associated with doing so; most people don’t have the bandwidth to understand all of them.

Blockchain, the distributed ledger technology behind cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, could improve loyalty programs with enhanced features like instant rewards redemption and loyalty point currency exchanges, centralizing them and making them more accountable and transparent. Blockchains improve transaction verifiability, integrity, and transparency by grouping transactions into blocks confirmed by a wide public network, or chain, of participants (hence the term “blockchain”). Afterwards, every ledger in the blockchain is updated to reflect the new transaction(s).

This is an improvement upon centralized databases, where intermediaries with full control over databases and the data they contain create, read, update, and even delete data as single points of failure. In contrast, blockchains rely on a network of people to verify transactions by validating and writing new data. Past entries never change, and new entries are written to update the state of past entries. This secures and strengthens the record of each one through consensus.

In the end, blockchains allow for decentralized control while traditional databases use centralized control to manage data, which is more fallible since a database administrator constitutes a single point of failure for everyone’s data security, were the security infrastructure to fail. On a blockchain, there is no single point of failure, improving data security and integrity.

Loyalty programs that grouped point currencies, rewards redemption options, and rules into one digital wallet would encourage companies to cooperate with one another to create shared value, since siloing loyalty programs over multiple blockchains creates saturation and detracts from consumer value. Instead, companies could co-create loyalty programs in partnership with blockchain platform developers to centralize information people need in order to easily reconcile all of the point options, redemption systems and point exchanges. This would help people make quicker and smarter decisions on which loyalty programs are best for their shopping habits and preferences. This would also make points and rewards redemption easier and more consistent, allowing consumers to redeem more rewards and points.

For businesses, blockchain tech would enable greater revenues by alleviating the balance sheet bottleneck created by unredeemed points. It would also let businesses explore new loyalty program models incorporating large and small business partners, allowing them to integrate seamlessly with loyalty programs. This could help businesses craft popular offers more easily and make it easier on businesses to distribute points since the entire process would be outsourced to the blockchains their programs were on. Blockchains’ decentralized nature allows greater verifiability and transparency of points distribution and rewards redemption by a wide network, freeing up back-end costs for other needs.

Blockchains aren’t infallible. With so many out there today, creating new blockchains on which to operate loyalty programs could create program saturation, detracting from loyalty programs’ ability to deliver value to customers. In addition, the blockchain-based transaction layer between consumers and loyalty program operators would, on paper, generate a small per-transaction cost for transactions associated with these loyalty programs, which could grow over time. Customer data could become available to other participants in the loyalty network, or to competitors. And, rewards currency could devalue in what would be an open marketplace for trading points.

The most basic way for companies to eliminate these risks is to take a ground-floor role in structuring commercial agreements and partnerships to protect the core components—currency value, customer data and relationships, and transaction costs—of their loyalty programs when creating or choosing a blockchain platform to run their loyalty programs.

Blockchain apps using cryptocurrency to power rewards and cash back have great potential to deliver new value to consumers, such as passive income, savings, and compound interest to help them buy more with less. This is because cryptocurrencies—not only Bitcoin, but also Ether, Litecoin, Ripple and others—are just as much assets as digital money with which to buy and sell things. Since blockchains are at the heart of many cryptocurrencies, loyalty programs can use them to turn everyday shoppers into investors, giving them a single place to redeem all of their rewards and get cash back in the form of crypto, creating more convenience and more value. Several disruptive use cases, such as BitRewards, FluzFluz, and Rewards.com are already putting these ideas into action.

Use Cases

BitRewards is a rewards network that works with token holders to confirm liquidity contracts between itself and partner cryptocurrency exchanges, allowing the platform to deliver rewards in cryptocurrency. Operating on the Ethereum blockchain, the BitRewards network uses a distributed system of nodes, or cryptocurrency-holding professionals operating on the platform, to fund rewards through their cryptocurrency exchanges through smart contracts that allow rewards to flow through the system, creating a liquid system of cryptocurrency rewards.

FluzFluz operates a global co-op network between merchants and consumers on JP Morgan’s Quorum blockchain, letting consumers build their own shopper networks and make passive cash back-based cryptocurrency income, both when shopping and when members of their networks shop. Each co-op member group (up to a maximum of 65,535 people) shares cash back internally, with 50% going to the purchaser and the rest being split equally among the members of the co-op. The FLUZ token is tradable for cash back rewards and gift cards, and helps fund network transparency and lower transaction costs.

Maurice Harary, Founder of Fluz Fluz, says, “A good leader creates followers, whereas a great leader creates other leaders. The global cash back rewards co-op technology at FluzFluz lets average consumers empower others to become influencers, grow the rewards network, and increase each member’s buying power and cash back potential as a result.”

Rewards.com recently incorporated cryptocurrency into its online rewards platform as well. Since it has thousands of retail partners across the country, its new RWRD token is redeemable at any one of them. By incorporating it as the platform’s core store of value with its enormous network of partners, Rewards.com is helping to put cryptocurrency into the wallets of more mainstream consumers by powering everything from cash back rewards to discounts on its platform.

These are all examples of ways in which blockchain technology and cryptocurrency are already beginning to impact the loyalty industry. Their founders have so much confidence in their products that they’ve all opened themselves up to questions on platforms like Telegram and Slack to help refine their products.

Looking Ahead

Blockchains and cryptocurrency have the potential to reshape the loyalty industry, helping consumers use multiple rewards programs across stores, making rewards transactions securer and more transparent, and centralizing cryptocurrency rewards programs in one place. Verifiability is an important part of this equation as well. Blockchain’s decentralized and transparent nature can allow loyalty programs to be used in one place and be open source. That adds accountability to these programs, since everyone monitoring a loyalty program’s blockchain would be responsible for verifying points, rewards redemption, and cash back transactions.

Previous ArticleNext Article

2 Comments

  1. After the meal, for anyone who is done eating, put your spoon and fork together on the side of home plate.
    We ought to focus regarding doing the great.
    Hitting and punishing kids younger than 2 years is pointless.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bitcoin Uses As Much Energy As Austria, Could Add 2°C to Earth’s Atmosphere 6 413

Bitcoin mining, it turns out, damages the earth more than more traditional environmental assaults like actual mineral mining.

According to a paper published Monday in Nature Sustainability, the power-hungry Bitcoin mining process consumes more than triple the amount of energy needed to mine the equivalent amount of gold, more than quadruple what’s needed for copper, and more than double what it takes to mine platinum.

Other coins didn’t fare much better. By their measurements, Ethereum and Litecoin consume 7 megajoules of electricity to produce the equivalent of $1, the same energy expenditure as copper mining but more than that of platinum or gold. Monero eats up 14 megajoules to produce $1.

Naturally, these measurements refer to the notoriously variable dollar valuations of such tokens. “While the market prices of the coins are quite volatile,” write researchers Max J. Krause and Thabet Tolaymat, “the network hashrates for three of the four cryptocurrencies have trended consistently upward, suggesting that energy requirements will continue to increase.”

Bitcoin’s Growing Electricity Bill is Bigger Than Some Countries

We’ve long known that Bitcoin is unsustainable. In a 2015 article for Motherboard, Christopher Malmo pointed out that a single Bitcoin transaction used 5,033 times as much energy as a Visa swipe, and could power 1.5 American homes for a day.

The electricity used to crunch Bitcoin code—and its environmental cost—has been growing with its increasing popularity. Digiconomist’s Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index shows Bitcoin currently consuming 73.12 terawatt hours (or 263.232 billion megajoules) of electricity annually. To put that in context, it’s comparable to the amount of energy it takes to power Austria for a year.

That means there are 175ish countries on earth using less energy than Bitcoin (to say nothing of crypto on the whole), while 66 countries consume less energy per capita than one Bitcoin transaction (it takes 94 thousand kilowatt hours of electricity to mine a single Bitcoin).

Iceland, a major hub of Bitcoin mining farms, spends nearly as much energy on Bitcoin as it does powering its residential homes. In this case, the damage is mitigated because most of Iceland’s power comes from renewable energy.

Canada’s Bitcoin emissions are also on the lower end due to renewable energy sources. They’re using this to court mining companies from China, where mining emissions are about four times that of Canada’s. Montreal International attracts foreign investment by calling Quebec the land of “green bitcoin”. This has caught the eye of some Chinese mining companies looking to go overseas as the Chinese government has discouraged expansion and shut down some mining operations altogether.

Depending on Bitcoin’s growth, some have projected that it could use as much energy as the entire world by 2020.

Digital Currency Has a Real Carbon Footprint

Krause’s and Tolaymat’s research reminds us of the sobering reality that all this invisible wealth has real world costs.

For the 30 months they measured between January 2016 and June 2018, they estimate their four featured tokens collectively belched out at least 3 million tons of CO2 emissions, possibly as much as 15 million tons.

These findings follow another study, published last month, which determined Bitcoin alone could add two degrees Celcius to global warming within the next three decades. That’s enough to raise ocean acidity by 29 percent.

Solving Bitcoin’s Energy Consumption Crisis

So what is the solution? If the world were to switch to 100 percent renewable energy overnight, the problem would be moot. But we can’t hold our breath for that. There could be ways of incentivizing clean energy so greener mines reap more coins, or of implementing clean energy in other ways.

It’s also possible to adopt less computationally intensive mining algorithms so the mining computers don’t guzzle as much juice. This would disappoint a lot of old school Bitcoiners who have invested in hardware, but their feelings don’t really outweigh that 2 degrees celcius that everyone will have to live with (or die by).

Whatever the best solution turns out to be, something needs to change soon. Bitcoin is growing up, and it’s time for it to mature into something more sustainable.

Kenya Looks to Blockchain for Affordable Housing Project 1 192

The “Silicon Savannah” is moving deeper in direction of tech. The Kenyan government has announced a plan to manage the property allocation and funding of 500,000 affordable housing units with blockchain technology.

The units, which the government aims to build by 2022, will be set aside for households with an annual income below 100,000 Kenyan Shillings, about $990 USD. The World Bank estimates Kenya’s gross national income per capita at $1,290, according to Business Daily.

Blockchain will help ensure that the affordable housing is in fact going to those who fall below the average income bracket. Land title fraud has caused problems for Kenyans, as land grabbers target homes and even schools for illegal sales and development. Blockchain’s ability to store verifiable proof of title could help safeguard against fraudsters.

“Kenya will use blockchain technology to ensure the rightful owners live in government funded housing projects,” said Principal Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Charles Hinga, speaking with the World Bank on Monday.

Hinga said the plan will be financed by the National Housing Fund, which will raise over $59.5 million per month to get the project underway. But Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Infrastructure, Housing and Urban Development James Macharia said it will take $31.7 billion to build a million homes, each of which will cost between $3,000 and $30,000. Macharia called for support from private sector financing.

Under the financing plan, working Kenyans will contribute 1.5 percent of their salary, which will be matched by their employers. “On affordable housing one should not spend more than 30% of their disposable income for housing,” Hinga tweeted yesterday. “Anything above 30% is not affordable.”

A Trustless Relationship Between People and Government

The initiative represents a considerable push to solve housing and title problems for the nation’s lower income families. But how will the government decide to whom the housing units will go? With so much talk about financing underway, people are already calling on the government to outline a plan for how they’ll distribute the affordable housing units.

The government will need to deliver the housing projects in a time when, Hinga acknowledges, the public is skeptical. Earlier this year $78 million went missing in a corruption scandal involving the National Youth Services. Where there is little trust between the people and their government, Kenya hopes to establish transparency through the blockchain’s distributed ledger system.

Kenya’s Move Toward Tech

In March, Kenya’s Ministry of Information, Communications and Technology appointed a blockchain taskforce to explore the ways the nation could use blockchain technology in the public and private sectors. They called it the Distributed Ledgers and Artificial Intelligence taskforce, and by September its chairman, Bitange Ndemo, was calling on the government to tokenize the economy.

Ndemo also proposed government implementation of blockchain to certify the authenticity of retail goods, so consumers can be sure of where their food is coming from, for example.

Governor of Kenya’s central bank Patrick Njoroge has also voiced support for the use of blockchain technology to strengthen service delivery, although he’s opposed the use of tokens and digital currencies.

But the affordable housing initiative could be the Kenyan government’s first real world implementation of the blockchain.

Most Popular Topics

Editor Picks